GOP makes 2008 a referendum on Bush-Clinton dynasty

A Question for Senator Obama.

Senator Obama:

Many Democrats admire Senator Clinton, but there is so much about her candidacy that could cost us the election in November. First of all, in both the Iowa and NH results, she lost the Independents, the youths, first time voters and voters seeking change to you - thereby questioning her electability. Her campaign disputed that turnout in the Iowa caucus could not be up to 200,000. Of the turnout you projected, rivals said "God bless senator Obama if he can pull it off". And yet no one credited you for the record 237,000 turnout. Even a recent Nevada poll shows that Nevadans prefer change over experience and they believe you’re best positioned to bring about change. You have brought up new ideas and creative approaches, while Senator Clinton is stuck to the old and copied you when she noticed your approach worked. Your policy proposals indicate a fundamentally new direction for America, while she's been recycling old Washington conventional wisdom, like using diplomatic dialogue as a way to reward nations like Iran.

Like John Kerry (unfortunately), Hillary Clinton "voted for the war in Iraq before she voted against it", she supported the Iran amendment; she's the master of healthcare fiasco in 1993; she claims she had access to classified info in the white house, even though she had no security clearance; her first lady records which were promised to be released right after the Iowa caucus are still locked up; she defends federal lobbyists and everything they represent; she's advised by someone who was charged with stealing classified CIA files; her strategist, Mark Penn has very questionable and disturbing corporate ties; she strongly supported NAFTA; she cries and then attacks you; the tricks she's been using against you seem like you're running against a Republican; in NH she attacked your present votes in Illinois and most NH voters had no idea that voting present is acceptable in Illinois; her supporters are now attacking your position on gaming; even though your stance only applied to Illinois, where gaming is not as well regulated as it is in Nevada; she tried to disenfranchise students in Iowa; now her supporters are trying to disenfranchise casino workers in Nevada. Bill Clinton never helped Gore and Kerry campaigns, which Democrats lost, but he's suddenly strong enough to campaign all-day for Hillary.

The way the Clintons have been overly negative, saying anything just to get elected, you kind of question their motive for wanting the Presidency again so desperately. Hillary will galvanize the Republicans and Bush-Clinton-Bush-Clinton fatigue would hurt Democrats. The GOP will make November's election a Refendum Against Bush-Clinton Dynastic Politics and Bill Clinton Trying to Circumnavigate the Constitution to seek a 3rd term. That's a legitimate line of attack and it's going to work !!!!!

Hillary Clinton has clearly been going negative in the last month. With so much baggage that she carries, why do you hesitate to go negative on her when you know that the Republicans would, anyway?